MSL wrote:Blue Day,
You stated in your original post that JBL is not Cranky Vince. You offered nothing to support that statement. You stated it's not an insider, even though the account frequently posted inside information that had yet to be disclosed publicly.
You then claimed that "every single" Cranky tweet is tweeted by Kaplan first. Last I checked, Kaplan has never tweeted WWE insider info. I'm not sure if English is your first language, but what you're writing is not consistent with the facts.
You seem to think you stumbled on to some outrageous discovery, apparently unaware that it was never a secret what inspired Cranky.
But how exactly does Cranky being a tribute to Kaplan "reveal" who is behind the Cranky account? It doesn't. The conclusions you're drawing are completely illogical.
What you've established is that Cranky Kaplan is what inspired the creation of Cranky Vince. But that's been known for years. What drew attention to Cranky Vince was not that many of the tweets were inspired by Kaplan. What drew attention to Cranky Vince was the legitimate news stories being broken by him.
None of which were taken from Kaplan, obviously.
So I'm really just not sure what your point is here and you lose all credibility when you make wholly inaccuracte statements like claiming "every single" Vince tweet is simply stolen from Kaplan. You're not making any sense.
MSL wrote:Very sad that Blue Day is struggling with basic logic.
Blue Day says "every single" Vince tweet was taken from Kaplan. His claim was that 100% of Vince's tweets were written by Kaplan first. This is obviously not even close to true and is the biggest indicator that Blue Day is just a troll.
When the flaw in his position is exposed, he then moves the goal posts and challenges me to back up a claim that 0% of Vince's tweets were taken from Kaplan. However, that is not a claim I ever made.
So Blue Day first insists on 100%, but then demands that I prove 0%.
Does that make sense to anyone else?
For those confused by this thread, Blue Day apparently just discovered that Cranky Vince is a spoof on Cranky Kaplan, an account that parodies a well known New York journalist. Many of the jokes used by the fake Kaplan account would end up regurgitated by the fake Vince account. The Kaplan account has nothing to do with wrestling, it's just an account about a cranky journalist that inspired somebody in wrestling to make the wrestling equivalent of Cranky Kaplan.
For some reason, Blue Day's position is that since Cranky Vince was inspired by Cranky Kaplan, that somehow that means that Cranky Vince is not somebody in wrestling. Why he would draw that conclusion, I have no idea. Now Blue Day claims that Cranky Vince has never revealed inside information, which means that Blue Day is either completely unfamiliar with Cranky Vince's history, OR, Blue Day is just a giant troll trying to cause a disruption here.
Draw your own conclusions. Is Blue Day insincere, OR, does Blue Day have a mental defect? It's one or the other and frankly I'm too bored to figure out which. Best of luck to others.
Blueday206 wrote:Xevious86 wrote:Wow this guy is TOTALLY avoiding the arguement about inside info from the WWE... I say mental defect.
Cool. What is the inside information? Seriously.
Users browsing this forum: rad_radford and 1 guest